[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220422131452.20757-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:14:51 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Natikar Basavaraj <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
Gong Richard <Richard.Gong@....com>,
<regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix regression in 5.18 for GPIO
Linus,
This patch is being sent directly to you because there has been
a regression in 5.18 that I identified and sent a fix up that has been
reviewed/tested/acked for nearly a week but the current subsystem
maintainer (Bartosz) hasn't picked it up to send to you.
It's a severe problem; anyone who hits it:
1) Power button doesn't work anymore
2) Can't resume their laptop from S3 or s2idle
Because the original patch was cc stable@, it landed in stable releases
and has been breaking people left and right as distros track the stable
channels. The patch is well tested. Would you please consider to pick
this up directly to fix that regression?
Thanks,
Mario Limonciello (1):
gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists