linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] devcoredump : Serialize devcd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e59d076bc05ed319732ac3e234e423affae1cafe.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:53:35 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, sboyd@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devcoredump : Serialize devcd_del work

On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 15:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 15:57 +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > In following scenario(diagram), when one thread X running dev_coredumpm() adds devcd
> > device to the framework which sends uevent notification to userspace
> > and another thread Y reads this uevent and call to devcd_data_write()
> > which eventually try to delete the queued timer that is not initialized/queued yet.
> > 
> > So, debug object reports some warning and in the meantime, timer is initialized
> > and queued from X path. and from Y path, it gets reinitialized again and
> > timer->entry.pprev=NULL and try_to_grab_pending() stucks.
> > 
> > To fix this, introduce mutex to serialize the behaviour.
> > 
> >  	cpu0(X)			                      cpu1(Y)
> > 
> >     dev_coredump() uevent sent to userspace
> >     device_add()  =========================> userspace process Y reads the uevents
> >                                              writes to devcd fd which
> >                                              results into writes to
> > 
> >                                             devcd_data_write()
> >                                               mod_delayed_work()
> >                                                 try_to_grab_pending()
> >                                                   del_timer()
> >                                                     debug_assert_init()
> >    INIT_DELAYED_WORK
> >    schedule_delayed_work
> > 
> 
> Wouldn't it be easier to simply schedule this before adding it to sysfs
> and sending the uevent?
> 

Hm. I think that would solve this problem, but not all of the problems
here ...

Even with your change, I believe it's still racy wrt. disabled_store(),
since that flushes the work but devcd_data_write() remains reachable
(and might in fact be waiting for the mutex after your change), so I
think we need an additional flag somewhere (in addition to the mutex) to
serialize all of these things against each other.

johannes