[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r15p5gcz.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:42:52 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
André Almeida
<andrealmeid@...labora.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] futex: exit: Print a warning when futex_cleanup fails
On Fri, Apr 22 2022 at 10:23, Nico Pache wrote:
> On 4/21/22 16:53, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21 2022 at 15:05, Nico Pache wrote:
>> Robust futexes are best effort as I explained you before and spamming
>> dmesg won't help anything.
> It would have helped find the OOM/Robust Futex issue more quickly. It may also
> help detect breakages in the pthread code (or any other users of robust futex)
> if someone is doing something incorrectly.
If we follow that line of argumentation then we have to sprinkle printks
en masse all over the place as there are a gazillion ways to create hard
to debug issues.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists