[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmLBTBd+5RHzr9MK@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:53:00 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>
Cc: daniel@...ll.ch, tj@...nel.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, jstultz@...gle.com,
cmllamas@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com, Kenny.Ho@....com,
mkoutny@...e.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/6] Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:52:18PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> This patch series revisits the proposal for a GPU cgroup controller to
> track and limit memory allocations by various device/allocator
> subsystems. The patch series also contains a simple prototype to
> illustrate how Android intends to implement DMA-BUF allocator
> attribution using the GPU cgroup controller. The prototype does not
> include resource limit enforcements.
>
> Changelog:
> v5:
> Rebase on top of v5.18-rc3
Why is a "RFC" series on v5? I treat "RFC" as "not ready to be merged,
if people are interested, please look at it". But v5 seems like you
think this is real.
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists