[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202204231333.D1x82f1d-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 13:17:52 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Donghai Qiao <dqiao@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, arnd@...db.de, peterz@...radead.org,
heying24@...wei.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, rdunlap@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
gor@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, donghai.w.qiao@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Donghai Qiao <dqiao@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] smp: modify up.c to adopt the same format of
cross CPU call.
Hi Donghai,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next linus/master v5.18-rc3]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core next-20220422]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Donghai-Qiao/smp-cross-CPU-call-interface/20220423-060436
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: x86_64-randconfig-a013 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220423/202204231333.D1x82f1d-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.2.0-20) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/655b898028ef1555f6bec036db8d4681b551aaa8
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Donghai-Qiao/smp-cross-CPU-call-interface/20220423-060436
git checkout 655b898028ef1555f6bec036db8d4681b551aaa8
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_mask':
>> kernel/up.c:50:18: error: 'cpu' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fpu'?
50 | smp_call(cpu, func, info, type);
| ^~~
| fpu
kernel/up.c:50:18: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
kernel/up.c:44:23: warning: unused variable 'flags' [-Wunused-variable]
44 | unsigned long flags;
| ^~~~~
kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_mask_cond':
kernel/up.c:80:26: error: 'cpu' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fpu'?
80 | smp_call(cpu, func, info, type);
| ^~~
| fpu
kernel/up.c:76:23: warning: unused variable 'flags' [-Wunused-variable]
76 | unsigned long flags;
| ^~~~~
In file included from include/linux/percpu.h:7,
from include/linux/context_tracking_state.h:5,
from include/linux/hardirq.h:5,
from include/linux/interrupt.h:11,
from kernel/up.c:6:
At top level:
include/linux/smp.h:131:14: warning: 'seq_type' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
131 | static char *seq_type[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~
vim +50 kernel/up.c
41
42 void smp_call_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, smp_call_func_t func, void *info, unsigned int type)
43 {
44 unsigned long flags;
45
46 if (!cpumask_test_cpu(0, mask))
47 return;
48
49 preempt_disable();
> 50 smp_call(cpu, func, info, type);
51 preempt_enable();
52 }
53 EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_mask);
54
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists