[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <165069790028.11296.14239261919383930715.kvalo@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:11:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wlcore: testmode: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead
of
pm_runtime_get_sync()
cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.
3447eebe6084 wlcore: testmode: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220413093502.2538316-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists