[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2fdc71ed-b99c-22d9-c921-6eba134ee1f8@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 12:58:17 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: nick.hawkins@....com, verdun@....com, joel@....id.au,
arnd@...db.de, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] dt-bindings: arm: Add HPE GXP Binding
On 21/04/2022 21:21, nick.hawkins@....com wrote:
> From: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@....com>
>
> This adds support for the hpe,gxp binding.
Just "Add support for HPE GXP".
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95
> The GXP is based on
> the cortex a9 processor and supports arm7.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@....com>
>
> ---
> v5:
> * Fix version log
> v4:
> * Removed gxp.yaml
> * Created hpe,gxp.yaml based on reviewer input
> v3:
> * Created gxp.yaml
> v2:
> * No change
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/hpe,gxp.yaml | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hpe,gxp.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hpe,gxp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hpe,gxp.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cd86b67ea207
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hpe,gxp.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/hpe,gxp.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: HPE BMC GXP SoC driver
This is not a SoC driver anymore, so instead maybe:
"HPE BMC GXP SoC platforms"
or
"HPE BMC GXP platforms"
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@....com>
> + - Jean-Marie Verdun <verdun@....com>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
You do not allow any extension of this (no oneOf), which is fine if you
do not plan any other SoCs or SoMs. This is okay, but if there is a
chance list will grow, then you should have here oneOf, like other bindings.
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - hpe,gxp-dl360gen10
> + - const: hpe,gxp
> +
> +additionalProperties: true
> +
> +...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists