linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: core: Remove redundant wmb() in ufshcd_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 23 Apr 2022 17:16:35 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:     martin.petersen@...cle.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        avri.altman@....com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: core: Remove redundant wmb() in
 ufshcd_send_command()

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:19:14PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/22/22 06:21, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > The wmb() inside ufshcd_send_command() is added to make sure that the
> > doorbell is committed immediately.
> 
> That's not the purpose of the wmb() call so I think the comment is wrong.
> 
> > This leads to couple of expectations:
> > 
> > 1. The doorbell write should complete before the function return.
> > 2. The doorbell write should not cross the function boundary.
> > 
> > 2nd expectation is fullfilled by the Linux memory model as there is a
> > guarantee that the critical section won't cross the unlock (release)
> > operation.
> 
> I think you meant that the writel() won't cross the unlock operation?
> 

yes!

Thanks,
Mani

> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index 9349557b8a01..ec514a6c5393 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -2116,9 +2116,6 @@ void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int task_tag)
> >   	__set_bit(task_tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
> >   	ufshcd_writel(hba, 1 << task_tag, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
> >   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
> > -
> > -	/* Make sure that doorbell is committed immediately */
> > -	wmb();
> >   }
> 
> Anyway:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>