[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmQsagqMn56jidFZ@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 09:42:18 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@...il.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Julien Grall <julien@....org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 6/6] arm/xen: Assign xen-grant DMA ops for xen-grant
DMA devices
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:51:03PM +0300, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> static inline void xen_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> - if (xen_swiotlb_detect())
> + if (arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access() &&
> + xen_is_grant_dma_device(dev))
> + xen_grant_setup_dma_ops(dev);
> + else if (xen_swiotlb_detect())
I don't think that arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access
check should be there as it still is a bit of a layering violation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists