lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <011311d4-7139-c10c-edd7-119f5466469e@nvidia.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Apr 2022 10:50:55 +0530
From:   Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com, digetx@...il.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, vdumpa@...dia.com,
        Snikam@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v7 3/4] dt-bindings: memory: Update reg/reg-names
 validation



On 4/17/2022 2:57 PM, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/13/2022 7:07 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:10:11PM +0530, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
>>>  From tegra186 onwards, memory controller support multiple channels.
>>> Reg items are updated with address and size of these channels.
>>> Tegra186 has overall 5 memory controller channels. Tegra194 and tegra234
>>> have overall 17 memory controller channels each.
>>> There is 1 reg item for memory controller stream-id registers.
>>> So update the reg maxItems to 18 in tegra186 devicetree documentation.
>>> Also update validation for reg-names added for these corresponding reg
>>> items.
>>
>> Somehow your subject should indicate this is for Tegra.
>>
> Okay, I'll update the subject.
> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml                   | 80 +++++++++++++++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git 
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml 
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml 
>>>
>>> index 13c4c82fd0d3..c7cfa6c2cd81 100644
>>> --- 
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml 
>>>
>>> +++ 
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra186-mc.yaml 
>>>
>>> @@ -34,8 +34,12 @@ properties:
>>>             - nvidia,tegra234-mc
>>>
>>>     reg:
>>> -    minItems: 1
>>> -    maxItems: 3
>>> +    minItems: 6
>>
>> You just broke current users.
>>
> The DTS changes are handled in driver. The driver is compatible with
> older DTS as well. dt bindings check will fail but that will request
> the users to switch to new DTS. Will that be fine?
> 
>>> +    maxItems: 18
>>> +
>>> +  reg-names:
>>> +    minItems: 6
>>> +    maxItems: 18
>>>
>>>     interrupts:
>>>       items:
>>> @@ -142,7 +146,18 @@ allOf:
>>>       then:
>>>         properties:
>>>           reg:
>>> -          maxItems: 1
>>> +          maxItems: 6
>>> +          description: 5 memory controller channels and 1 for 
>>> stream-id registers
>>> +
>>> +        reg-names:
>>> +          maxItems: 6
>>> +          items:
>>> +            - const: sid
>>> +            - const: broadcast
>>> +            - const: ch0
>>> +            - const: ch1
>>> +            - const: ch2
>>> +            - const: ch3
>>>
>>>     - if:
>>>         properties:
>>> @@ -151,7 +166,30 @@ allOf:
>>>       then:
>>>         properties:
>>>           reg:
>>> -          minItems: 3
>>> +          minItems: 18
>>> +          description: 17 memory controller channels and 1 for 
>>> stream-id registers
>>> +
>>> +        reg-names:
>>> +          minItems: 18
>>> +          items:
>>> +            - const: sid
>>> +            - const: broadcast
>>> +            - const: ch0
>>> +            - const: ch1
>>> +            - const: ch2
>>> +            - const: ch3
>>> +            - const: ch4
>>> +            - const: ch5
>>> +            - const: ch6
>>> +            - const: ch7
>>> +            - const: ch8
>>> +            - const: ch9
>>> +            - const: ch10
>>> +            - const: ch11
>>> +            - const: ch12
>>> +            - const: ch13
>>> +            - const: ch14
>>> +            - const: ch15
>>>
>>>     - if:
>>>         properties:
>>> @@ -160,13 +198,37 @@ allOf:
>>>       then:
>>>         properties:
>>>           reg:
>>> -          minItems: 3
>>> +          minItems: 18
>>> +          description: 17 memory controller channels and 1 for 
>>> stream-id registers
>>> +
>>> +        reg-names:
>>> +          minItems: 18
>>> +          items:
>>> +            - const: sid
>>> +            - const: broadcast
>>> +            - const: ch0
>>> +            - const: ch1
>>> +            - const: ch2
>>> +            - const: ch3
>>> +            - const: ch4
>>> +            - const: ch5
>>> +            - const: ch6
>>> +            - const: ch7
>>> +            - const: ch8
>>> +            - const: ch9
>>> +            - const: ch10
>>> +            - const: ch11
>>> +            - const: ch12
>>> +            - const: ch13
>>> +            - const: ch14
>>> +            - const: ch15
>>>
>>>   additionalProperties: false
>>>
>>>   required:
>>>     - compatible
>>>     - reg
>>> +  - reg-names
>>
>> New, added properties cannot be required. That's an ABI break.
>>
> This is handled in driver code to make sure driver works with old dts
> as well. So is this bindings change fine or shall I change it such that
> dt bindings check shall pass with older dts as well?
> Or as mentioned by Dmitry, I can update the commit message to reflect
> that ABI change is intended and driver is compatible with older DTBs as
> well.
> 
Hi Rob,
Can you please confirm how shall I go in next version?
Is it fine for dt bindings check to fail if driver is compatible with
old as well as new dts? Or dt bindings check shall pass with old as
well as new dts?

>>>     - interrupts
>>>     - "#address-cells"
>>>     - "#size-cells"
>>> @@ -182,7 +244,13 @@ examples:
>>>
>>>           memory-controller@...0000 {
>>>               compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-mc";
>>> -            reg = <0x0 0x02c00000 0x0 0xb0000>;
>>> +            reg = <0x0 0x02c00000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* MC-SID */
>>> +                  <0x0 0x02c10000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* Broadcast 
>>> channel */
>>> +                  <0x0 0x02c20000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* MC0 */
>>> +                  <0x0 0x02c30000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* MC1 */
>>> +                  <0x0 0x02c40000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* MC2 */
>>> +                  <0x0 0x02c50000 0x0 0x10000>;    /* MC3 */
>>> +            reg-names = "sid", "broadcast", "ch0", "ch1", "ch2", "ch3";
>>>               interrupts = <GIC_SPI 223 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>
>>>               #address-cells = <2>;
>>> -- 
>>> 2.17.1
>>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ