[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220424125951.GD978927@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 20:59:51 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: arm-spe: Fix SPE events with phys addresses
Hi Timothy,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 05:52:04PM +0100, Timothy Hayes wrote:
> This patch corrects a bug whereby SPE collection is invoked with
> pa_enable=1 but synthesized events fail to show physical addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@....com>
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c | 10 ++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
> index af4d63af8072..e8b577d33e53 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static int arm_spe_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> bool privileged = perf_event_paranoid_check(-1);
> struct evsel *tracking_evsel;
> int err;
> + u64 bit;
>
> sper->evlist = evlist;
>
> @@ -245,6 +246,15 @@ static int arm_spe_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> */
> evsel__set_sample_bit(arm_spe_evsel, DATA_SRC);
>
> + /*
> + * The PHYS_ADDR flag does not affect the driver behaviour, it is used to
> + * inform that the resulting output's SPE samples contain physical addresses
> + * where applicable.
> + */
> + bit = perf_pmu__format_bits(&arm_spe_pmu->format, "pa_enable");
> + if (arm_spe_evsel->core.attr.config & bit)
> + evsel__set_sample_bit(arm_spe_evsel, PHYS_ADDR);
> +
> /* Add dummy event to keep tracking */
> err = parse_events(evlist, "dummy:u", NULL);
> if (err)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> index 151cc38a171c..1a80151baed9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> @@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ arm_spe_synth_events(struct arm_spe *spe, struct perf_session *session)
> memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(struct perf_event_attr));
> attr.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr);
> attr.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
> - attr.sample_type = evsel->core.attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_MASK;
> + attr.sample_type = evsel->core.attr.sample_type &
> + (PERF_SAMPLE_MASK | PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR);
I verified this patch and I can confirm the physical address can be
dumped successfully.
I have a more general question, seems to me, we need to change the
macro PERF_SAMPLE_MASK in the file util/event.h as below, so
here doesn't need to 'or' the flag PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR anymore.
@Arnaldo, @Jiri, could you confirm if this is the right way to move
forward? I am not sure why PERF_SAMPLE_MASK doesn't contain the bit
PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR in current code.
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.h b/tools/perf/util/event.h
index cdd72e05fd28..c905ac32ebad 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/event.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/event.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct perf_event_attr;
PERF_SAMPLE_TIME | PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR | \
PERF_SAMPLE_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_STREAM_ID | \
PERF_SAMPLE_CPU | PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD | \
- PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER)
+ PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER | PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR)
Thanks,
Leo
> attr.sample_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_IP | PERF_SAMPLE_TID |
> PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD | PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC |
> PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT | PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists