[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220424183058.5119dbf5@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 18:30:58 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Cixi Geng <gengcixi@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, orsonzhai@...il.com,
baolin.wang7@...il.com, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
yuming.zhu1@...soc.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/7] iio: adc: refactor some functions for support
more PMiCs
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 22:24:56 +0800
Cixi Geng <gengcixi@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@...soc.com>
Added sc27xx to patch title whilst applying.
Also a small amount of 'fuzz' as a result of the edit I made to the earlier
patch to drop the comment but I think it all went in cleanly.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Refactor the common adc_nvmem_cell_calib_data,adc_to_volt and call
> these in the origin sc27xx_adc_scale_calibration,sc27xx_adc_to_volt
>
> Signed-off-by: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@...soc.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> index a8906ffd85bf..27fab579a281 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> @@ -138,16 +138,41 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_get_calib_data(u32 calib_data, int calib_adc)
> return ((calib_data & 0xff) + calib_adc - 128) * 4;
> }
>
> +/* get the adc nvmem cell calibration data */
> +static int adc_nvmem_cell_calib_data(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data, const char *cell_name)
> +{
> + struct nvmem_cell *cell;
> + void *buf;
> + u32 origin_calib_data = 0;
> + size_t len;
> +
> + if (!data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + cell = nvmem_cell_get(data->dev, cell_name);
> + if (IS_ERR(cell))
> + return PTR_ERR(cell);
> +
> + buf = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &len);
> + if (IS_ERR(buf)) {
> + nvmem_cell_put(cell);
> + return PTR_ERR(buf);
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(&origin_calib_data, buf, min(len, sizeof(u32)));
> +
> + kfree(buf);
> + nvmem_cell_put(cell);
> + return origin_calib_data;
> +}
> +
> static int sc27xx_adc_scale_calibration(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data,
> bool big_scale)
> {
> const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *calib_graph;
> struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *graph;
> - struct nvmem_cell *cell;
> const char *cell_name;
> u32 calib_data = 0;
> - void *buf;
> - size_t len;
>
> if (big_scale) {
> calib_graph = data->var_data->bscale_cal;
> @@ -159,24 +184,13 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_scale_calibration(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data,
> cell_name = "small_scale_calib";
> }
>
> - cell = nvmem_cell_get(data->dev, cell_name);
> - if (IS_ERR(cell))
> - return PTR_ERR(cell);
> -
> - buf = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &len);
> - nvmem_cell_put(cell);
> -
> - if (IS_ERR(buf))
> - return PTR_ERR(buf);
> -
> - memcpy(&calib_data, buf, min(len, sizeof(u32)));
> + calib_data = adc_nvmem_cell_calib_data(data, cell_name);
>
> /* Only need to calibrate the adc values in the linear graph. */
> graph->adc0 = sc27xx_adc_get_calib_data(calib_data, calib_graph->adc0);
> graph->adc1 = sc27xx_adc_get_calib_data(calib_data >> 8,
> calib_graph->adc1);
>
> - kfree(buf);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -312,7 +326,7 @@ static void sc27xx_adc_volt_ratio(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data,
> *div_denominator = ratio & SC27XX_RATIO_DENOMINATOR_MASK;
> }
>
> -static int sc27xx_adc_to_volt(struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *graph,
> +static int adc_to_volt(struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *graph,
> int raw_adc)
> {
> int tmp;
> @@ -321,6 +335,16 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_to_volt(struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *graph,
> tmp /= (graph->adc0 - graph->adc1);
> tmp += graph->volt1;
>
> + return tmp;
> +}
> +
> +static int sc27xx_adc_to_volt(struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *graph,
> + int raw_adc)
> +{
> + int tmp;
> +
> + tmp = adc_to_volt(graph, raw_adc);
> +
> return tmp < 0 ? 0 : tmp;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists