[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220425165037.GA17718@lpieralisi>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:50:37 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: "Andrea Parri (Microsoft)" <parri.andrea@...il.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Hu <weh@...rosoft.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI: hv: Use vmbus_requestor to generate
transaction IDs for VMbus hardening
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 02:23:21PM +0200, Andrea Parri (Microsoft) wrote:
> Currently, pointers to guest memory are passed to Hyper-V as transaction
> IDs in hv_pci. In the face of errors or malicious behavior in Hyper-V,
> hv_pci should not expose or trust the transaction IDs returned by
> Hyper-V to be valid guest memory addresses. Instead, use small integers
> generated by vmbus_requestor as request (transaction) IDs.
>
> Suggested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index 88b3b56d05228..0252b4bbc8d15 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,13 @@ static enum pci_protocol_version_t pci_protocol_versions[] = {
> /* space for 32bit serial number as string */
> #define SLOT_NAME_SIZE 11
>
> +/*
> + * Size of requestor for VMbus; the value is based on the observation
> + * that having more than one request outstanding is 'rare', and so 64
> + * should be generous in ensuring that we don't ever run out.
> + */
> +#define HV_PCI_RQSTOR_SIZE 64
> +
> /*
> * Message Types
> */
> @@ -1407,7 +1414,7 @@ static void hv_int_desc_free(struct hv_pci_dev *hpdev,
> int_pkt->wslot.slot = hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot;
> int_pkt->int_desc = *int_desc;
> vmbus_sendpacket(hpdev->hbus->hdev->channel, int_pkt, sizeof(*int_pkt),
> - (unsigned long)&ctxt.pkt, VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0);
> + 0, VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0);
> kfree(int_desc);
> }
>
> @@ -2649,7 +2656,7 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct *work)
> ejct_pkt->message_type.type = PCI_EJECTION_COMPLETE;
> ejct_pkt->wslot.slot = hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot;
> vmbus_sendpacket(hbus->hdev->channel, ejct_pkt,
> - sizeof(*ejct_pkt), (unsigned long)&ctxt.pkt,
> + sizeof(*ejct_pkt), 0,
> VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0);
>
> /* For the get_pcichild() in hv_pci_eject_device() */
> @@ -2696,8 +2703,9 @@ static void hv_pci_onchannelcallback(void *context)
> const int packet_size = 0x100;
> int ret;
> struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus = context;
> + struct vmbus_channel *chan = hbus->hdev->channel;
> u32 bytes_recvd;
> - u64 req_id;
> + u64 req_id, req_addr;
> struct vmpacket_descriptor *desc;
> unsigned char *buffer;
> int bufferlen = packet_size;
> @@ -2715,8 +2723,8 @@ static void hv_pci_onchannelcallback(void *context)
> return;
>
> while (1) {
> - ret = vmbus_recvpacket_raw(hbus->hdev->channel, buffer,
> - bufferlen, &bytes_recvd, &req_id);
> + ret = vmbus_recvpacket_raw(chan, buffer, bufferlen,
> + &bytes_recvd, &req_id);
>
> if (ret == -ENOBUFS) {
> kfree(buffer);
> @@ -2743,11 +2751,14 @@ static void hv_pci_onchannelcallback(void *context)
> switch (desc->type) {
> case VM_PKT_COMP:
>
> - /*
> - * The host is trusted, and thus it's safe to interpret
> - * this transaction ID as a pointer.
> - */
> - comp_packet = (struct pci_packet *)req_id;
> + req_addr = chan->request_addr_callback(chan, req_id);
> + if (req_addr == VMBUS_RQST_ERROR) {
> + dev_err(&hbus->hdev->device,
> + "Invalid transaction ID %llx\n",
> + req_id);
> + break;
> + }
> + comp_packet = (struct pci_packet *)req_addr;
> response = (struct pci_response *)buffer;
> comp_packet->completion_func(comp_packet->compl_ctxt,
> response,
> @@ -3428,6 +3439,10 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
> goto free_dom;
> }
>
> + hdev->channel->next_request_id_callback = vmbus_next_request_id;
> + hdev->channel->request_addr_callback = vmbus_request_addr;
> + hdev->channel->rqstor_size = HV_PCI_RQSTOR_SIZE;
> +
> ret = vmbus_open(hdev->channel, pci_ring_size, pci_ring_size, NULL, 0,
> hv_pci_onchannelcallback, hbus);
> if (ret)
> @@ -3758,6 +3773,10 @@ static int hv_pci_resume(struct hv_device *hdev)
>
> hbus->state = hv_pcibus_init;
>
> + hdev->channel->next_request_id_callback = vmbus_next_request_id;
> + hdev->channel->request_addr_callback = vmbus_request_addr;
> + hdev->channel->rqstor_size = HV_PCI_RQSTOR_SIZE;
> +
> ret = vmbus_open(hdev->channel, pci_ring_size, pci_ring_size, NULL, 0,
> hv_pci_onchannelcallback, hbus);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists