[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8f0436d-3389-04bb-089d-aca4b4d8d7fd@foss.st.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:21:17 +0200
From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, <arnd@...db.de>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <soc@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
<etienne.carriere@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: rcc: Add optional external ethernet RX
clock properties
Hi Marek
On 4/22/22 18:28, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 4/22/22 17:09, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>>
>> Describe optional external ethernet RX clock in the DT binding
>> to fix dtbs_check warnings like:
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp153c-dhcom-drc02.dt.yaml: rcc@...00000:
>> 'assigned-clock-parents', 'assigned-clock-rates', 'assigned-clocks',
>> 'clock-names', 'clocks' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>> Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
>> Cc: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>> To: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>> Acked-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
>> index a0ae4867ed27..7a251264582d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
>> @@ -59,6 +59,14 @@ properties:
>> - st,stm32mp1-rcc
>> - const: syscon
>> + clocks:
>> + description:
>> + Specifies the external RX clock for ethernet MAC.
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + clock-names:
>> + const: ETH_RX_CLK/ETH_REF_CLK
>> +
>> reg:
>> maxItems: 1
>
> Should this patch be part of this series, maybe this was re-sent by
> accident ?
Not by accident. As your patch is already merged in Rob tree (I guess),
I added it in this series to avoid merge conflict later. I added a late
note in the cover-letter.
regards
alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists