[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220425183343.GM2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 20:33:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, mgorman@...e.de,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tj@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched,ptrace: Fix ptrace_check_attach() vs
PREEMPT_RT
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 04:35:37PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/21, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > +static void clear_traced_quiesce(void)
> > +{
> > + spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->jobctl & JOBCTL_TRACED_QUIESCE));
>
> This WARN_ON_ONCE() doesn't look right, the task can be killed right
> after ptrace_stop() sets JOBCTL_TRACED | JOBCTL_TRACED_QUIESCE and
> drops siglock.
OK, will look at that.
> > @@ -2290,14 +2303,26 @@ static int ptrace_stop(int exit_code, in
> > /*
> > * Don't want to allow preemption here, because
> > * sys_ptrace() needs this task to be inactive.
> > - *
> > - * XXX: implement read_unlock_no_resched().
> > */
> > preempt_disable();
> > read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> > - cgroup_enter_frozen();
> > + cgroup_enter_frozen(); // XXX broken on PREEMPT_RT !!!
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * JOBCTL_TRACE_QUIESCE bridges the gap between
> > + * set_current_state(TASK_TRACED) above and schedule() below.
> > + * There must not be any blocking (specifically anything that
> > + * touched ->saved_state on PREEMPT_RT) between here and
> > + * schedule().
> > + *
> > + * ptrace_check_attach() relies on this with its
> > + * wait_task_inactive() usage.
> > + */
> > + clear_traced_quiesce();
>
> Well, I think it should be called earlier under tasklist_lock,
> before preempt_disable() above.
>
> We need tasklist_lock to protect ->parent, debugger can be killed
> and go away right after read_unlock(&tasklist_lock).
>
> Still trying to convince myself everything is right with
> JOBCTL_STOPPED/TRACED ...
Can't do it earlier, since cgroup_enter_frozen() can do spinlock (eg.
use ->saved_state).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists