linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: List supplies for qcom,edp-phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:06:43 -0700
From:   Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
Cc:     Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, quic_kalyant@...cinc.com,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: List supplies for qcom,edp-phy

We're supposed to list the supplies in the dt bindings but there are
none in the eDP PHY bindings.

Looking at the driver in Linux, I can see that there seem to be two
relevant supplies: "vdda-phy" and "vdda-pll". Let's add those to the
bindings.

NOTE: from looking at the Qualcomm datasheet for sc7280, it's not
immediately clear how to figure out how to fill in these supplies. The
only two eDP related supplies are simply described as "power for eDP
0.9V circuits" and "power for eDP 1.2V circuits". From guessing and
from comparing how a similar PHY is hooked up on other similar
Qualcomm boards, I'll make the educated guess that the 1.2V supply
goes to "vdda-phy" and the 0.9V supply goes to "vdda-pll" and I'll use
that in the example here.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,edp-phy.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,edp-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,edp-phy.yaml
index a5850ff529f8..cf9e9b8011cb 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,edp-phy.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,edp-phy.yaml
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ properties:
   "#phy-cells":
     const: 0
 
+  vdda-phy-supply: true
+  vdda-pll-supply: true
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg
@@ -65,5 +68,8 @@ examples:
 
       #clock-cells = <1>;
       #phy-cells = <0>;
+
+      vdda-phy-supply = <&vdd_a_edp_0_1p2>;
+      vdda-pll-supply = <&vdd_a_edp_0_0p9>;
     };
 ...
-- 
2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog