[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <488995ee-2a00-321c-126f-8ed7f8b82635@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:00:32 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] selftests/resctrl: Print a message if the result
of MBM&CMT tests is failed on Intel CPU
On 4/25/22 3:19 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Shuah,
>
> On 3/29/2022 8:37 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 3/23/22 2:09 AM, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The aim of this series is to print a message to let users know a possible
>>> cause of failure, if the result of MBM&CMT tests is failed on Intel CPU.
>>> In order to detect Intel vendor, I extended AMD vendor detect function.
>>>
>>> Difference from v4:
>>> - Fixed the typos.
>>> - Changed "get_vendor() != ARCH_AMD" to "get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL".
>>> - Reorder the declarations based on line length from longest to shortest.
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220316055940.292550-1-tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com/ [PATCH v4]
>>>
>>> This patch series is based on v5.17.
>>>
>>> Shaopeng Tan (2):
>>> selftests/resctrl: Extend CPU vendor detection
>>> selftests/resctrl: Print a message if the result of MBM&CMT tests is
>>> failed on Intel CPU
>>>
>>> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 2 +-
>>> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 5 ++-
>>> .../testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 45 +++++++++++++------
>>> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 2 +-
>>> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> I can queue this up for Linux 5.18-rc2. Thanks for fixing the error
>> path with clear messages for failures.
>
> Is this perhaps still in your queue for consideration? I peeked at the
> branches within the kselftest repo but could not find it merged yet.
> If things are tightened for fixes it would be welcome as v5.19 material
> also.
>
> Thank you very much
>
Thanks for the ping. The changes are a bit more extensive for a fix based
on my review comments. I queued these two in linux-kselftest next branch
for 5.19-rc1.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists