linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:42:05 +0300
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc:     cgel.zte@...il.com, ssantosh@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead
 of pm_runtime_get_sync

* Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> [220422 18:37]:
> On 06:30-20220418, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
> > 
> > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> > for simplifing code
> > 
> > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
> 
> Tony: Could you check?

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>