linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] scsi: libsas: Add sas_execute_internal_abort

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:34:08 +0200
From:   Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com,
        damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ajish.Koshy@...rochip.com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
        Viswas.G@...rochip.com, hch@....de, liuqi115@...wei.com,
        chenxiang66@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] scsi: libsas: Add sas_execute_internal_abort_single()

On 4/25/22 10:27, John Garry wrote:
> On 20/04/2022 13:21, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>   int sas_execute_tmf(struct domain_device *device, void *parameter,
>>>               int para_len, int force_phy_id,
>>>               struct sas_tmf_task *tmf)
>>> diff --git a/include/scsi/libsas.h b/include/scsi/libsas.h
>>> index df2c8fc43429..2d30d57916e5 100644
>>> --- a/include/scsi/libsas.h
>>> +++ b/include/scsi/libsas.h
>>> @@ -557,6 +557,16 @@ struct sas_ata_task {
>>>       int    force_phy_id;
>>>   };
>>> +/* LLDDs rely on these values */
>>> +enum sas_internal_abort {
>>> +    SAS_INTERNAL_ABORT_SINGLE    = 0,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> Why don't you use the existing TMF_XXX values here?
>> Your 'single' method pretty much _is_ a TMF_ABORT_TASK, and the 
>> 'device' method _is_ a TMF_ABORT_TASK_SET, no?
> 
> Sure, they are doing the same as TMFs and there is equivalence in the 
> 'single' and 'device' methods, as you say.
> 
> However, as mentioned in the comment, the LLDDs rely on the values in 
> enum sas_internal_abort, which do not match the values in 
> TMF_ABORT{_TASK, _TASK_SET}.
> 
How can they rely on a value which you just introduced?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		           Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer