[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmZ2MSQssUNwoprd@osiris>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:21:37 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, arnd@...db.de,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/17] s390: define get_cycles macro for arch-override
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:48:34AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On 4/25/22, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Is any of your subsequent patches making sure that the asm generic
> > header file gets included everywhere? Otherwise I don't see the point
> > of this patch.
>
> Yes; patch 6 requires this as a prereq. I'm not doing this arbitrarily.
Ok, that was not obvious to me, especially since I was only cc'ed for
this patch and assumed this was actually a bug fix.
Thanks for clarifying.
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists