linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 02/17] s390: define get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:21:37 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, arnd@...db.de,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/17] s390: define get_cycles macro for arch-override

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:48:34AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On 4/25/22, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Is any of your subsequent patches making sure that the asm generic
> > header file gets included everywhere? Otherwise I don't see the point
> > of this patch.
> 
> Yes; patch 6 requires this as a prereq. I'm not doing this arbitrarily.

Ok, that was not obvious to me, especially since I was only cc'ed for
this patch and assumed this was actually a bug fix.
Thanks for clarifying.

Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>