[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71c0dd94-8cd3-9ca0-f06d-ee13ad063618@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:25:55 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Etienne CARRIERE <etienne.carriere@...com>,
Alexandre TORGUE - foss <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"soc@...nel.org" <soc@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] ARM: dts: stm32: enable optee firmware and SCMI
support on STM32MP15
On 4/25/22 12:19, Etienne CARRIERE wrote:
> Hello Marek,
Hi,
>> From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>>
>>> On 4/22/22 17:09, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>> Enable optee and SCMI clocks/reset protocols support.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
>>> index 7fdc324b3cf9..1b2fd3426a81 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
>>> @@ -115,6 +115,33 @@
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>>
>>> + firmware {
>>> + optee: optee {
>>> + compatible = "linaro,optee-tz";
>>> + method = "smc";
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> + };
>>
>> Doesn't this TEE node get automatically generated and patched into DT by
>> the TEE ? I think OpTee-OS does that.
>
> OP-TEE OS does that if it gets passed the DT from early boot stage which is not always the case.
Shouldn't that be something to fix ?
I think R-Car3 does that already.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists