[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5fad2c0-598d-a90c-5272-398ce48399fe@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:20:04 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, soc@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: dts: tegra: Fix boolean properties with
values
On 12/04/2022 10:05, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 02:17:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Boolean properties in DT are present or not present and don't take a value.
>> A property such as 'foo = <0>;' evaluated to true. IOW, the value doesn't
>> matter.
>>
>> It may have been intended that 0 values are false, but there is no change
>> in behavior with this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> Can someone apply this for 5.18.
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p3310.dtsi | 8 ++++----
>> .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001.dts | 8 ++++----
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194-p2888.dtsi | 6 +++---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194-p3668.dtsi | 6 +++---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2180.dtsi | 6 +++---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2894.dtsi | 8 ++++----
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p3450-0000.dts | 8 ++++----
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-smaug.dts | 4 ++--
>> 8 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> This causes multiple regressions on Tegra boards. The reason for this is
> that these properties are not in fact boolean, despite what the DT
> bindings say. If you look at the code that handles these, you'll notice
> that they are single-cell properties, typically with <0> and <1> values.
> What may have led to the conclusion that these are boolean is that there
> is also a special case where these can be left out, but the meaning of
> that is not the "false" (<0>) value. Instead, leaving these out means
> that the values should be left at whatever is currently in the register.
>
> See pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config() and parse_dt_cfg() specifically in
> drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c.
>
> Arnd, can you please revert this so that these boards can be unbroken?
Arnd, any feedback on this? A lot of Tegra boards are still not booting
with v5.18-rc4.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists