[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1efd4c00-4c78-2330-cfb3-fe81493e7e68@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:47:21 +0200
From: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@...il.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, roopa@...dia.com, jdenham@...hat.com,
sbrivio@...hat.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, vladimir.oltean@....com, claudiu.manoil@....com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, shshaikh@...vell.com,
manishc@...vell.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] rtnetlink: add extack support in fdb del
handlers
On ٢٤/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٢٣:٥٢, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 4/25/22 00:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>
>> On ٢٤/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٥٥, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> On 24/04/2022 22:49, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>> On ٢٤/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٠٢, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>>>> On 24/04/2022 15:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>>>> Add extack support to .ndo_fdb_del in netdevice.h and
>>>>>> all related methods.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@...il.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> changes in V3:
>>>>>> fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> drivers/net/macvlan.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/bridge/br_private.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> 9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> index d768925785ca..7b55d8d94803 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> @@ -5678,10 +5678,10 @@ ice_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct
>>>>>> nlattr __always_unused *tb[],
>>>>>> static int
>>>>>> ice_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, __always_unused struct nlattr
>>>>>> *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr,
>>>>>> - __always_unused u16 vid)
>>>>>> + __always_unused u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> int err;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> +
>>>>> What's changed here?
>>>> In the previous version, I removed the blank line after "int err;"
>>>> and you said I shouldn't so I added blank line.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, my question is are you fixing a dos ending or something else?
>>> The blank line is already there, what's wrong with it?
>> No, I didn't.
>>>
>>> The point is it's not nice to mix style fixes and other changes,
>>> more so
>>> if nothing is mentioned in the commit message.
>> Got it, So, what should I do to fix it?
>
> Don't change that line? I mean I'm even surprised this made it in the
> patch. As I mentioned above, there is already a new line there so I'm
> not sure how you're removing it and adding it again. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Nik
Thanks Nik, I will fix this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists