[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3118843.1650888461@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:07:41 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
Rohith Surabattula <rohiths.msft@...il.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@...il.com>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] mm, netfs, fscache: Stop read optimisation when folio removed from pagecache
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> OK. You suggested that releasepage was an acceptable place to call it.
> How about we have AS_RELEASE_ALL (... or something ...) and then
> page_has_private() becomes a bit more complicated ... to the point
> where we should probably get rid of it (by embedding it into
> filemap_release_folio():
I'm not sure page_has_private() is quite so easy to get rid of.
shrink_page_list() and collapse_file(), for example, use it to conditionalise
a call to try_to_release_page() plus some other bits.
I think that, for the moment, I would need to add a check for AS_RELEASE_ALL
to page_has_private().
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists