linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] kasan: Prevent cpu_quarantine corruption when CPU offline and cache shrink occur at same time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:25:16 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     "ryabinin.a.a@...il.com" <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        "dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Alexander Potapenko" <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] kasan: Prevent cpu_quarantine corruption when CPU offline
 and cache shrink occur at same time

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:59:25 +0800 Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com> wrote:

> The kasan_quarantine_remove_cache() is called in kmem_cache_shrink()/ 
> destroy(), the kasan_quarantine_remove_cache() call is protected by 
> cpuslock in kmem_cache_destroy(), can ensure serialization with 
> kasan_cpu_offline(). however the kasan_quarantine_remove_cache() call 
> is not protected by cpuslock in kmem_cache_shrink(), when CPU going 
> offline and cache shrink occur at same time, the cpu_quarantine may be 
> corrupted by interrupt(per_cpu_remove_cache operation). so add 
> cpu_quarantine offline flags check in per_cpu_remove_cache().
> 
> ...
>

>Could we please have some reviewer input here?

> --- a/mm/kasan/quarantine.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/quarantine.c
> @@ -330,6 +330,8 @@ static void per_cpu_remove_cache(void *arg)
>  	struct cpu_shrink_qlist *sq;
>  #endif
>  	q = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_quarantine);
> +	if (READ_ONCE(q->offline))
> +		return;
>  #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
>  	qlist_move_cache(q, &to_free, cache);
>  	qlist_free_all(&to_free, cache);

>It might be helpful to have a little comment which explains why we're doing this?

Sorry for late reply,  may be add some comment:

Ensure the ordering between the writing to q->offline and per_cpu_remove_cache.
prevent cpu_quarantine be corrupted by interrupt.

Is this OK ?

Thanks
Zqiang