linux-kernel - [PATCH V2] arm64: add SCHED_CLUSTER's dependency on ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SL2PR06MB3082544EFB9C6F518A2EBF04BDFB9@SL2PR06MB3082.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 02:23:25 +0000
From:   王擎 <wangqing@...o.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] arm64: add SCHED_CLUSTER's dependency on ACPI


>> 
>> >> From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
>> >> 
>> >> cluster sched_domain configured by cpu_topology[].cluster_sibling, 
>> >> which is set by cluster_id, cluster_id can only get from ACPI.
>> >> 
>> >> If the system does not enable ACPI, cluster_id is always -1, even enable
>> >> SCHED_CLUSTER is invalid, this is misleading. 
>> >> 
>> >> So we add SCHED_CLUSTER's dependency on ACPI here.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Any reason why this can't be extended to support DT based systems via
>> >cpu-map in the device tree. IMO we almost have everything w.r.t topology
>> >in DT and no reason to deviate this feature between ACPI and DT.
>> >
>> That's the problem, we parse out "cluster" info according to the
>> description in cpu-map, but do assign it to package_id, which used to
>> configure the MC sched domain, not cluster sched domain.
>>
>
>Right, we haven't updated the code after updating the bindings to match
>ACPI sockets which are the physical package boundaries. Clusters are not
>the physical boundaries and the current topology code is not 100% aligned
>with the bindings after Commit 849b384f92bc ("Documentation: DT: arm: add
>support for sockets defining package boundaries")

I see, but this commit is a long time ago, why hasn't it been used widely.
Maybe I can help about it if you need.

Thanks,
Qing

>
>> That is to say, "cluster" in cpu-map is used to describe the package_id.
>> We can't get cluster_id from DT.
>>
>
>That is wrong, we have "socket" to describe the package_id now.
>
>--
>Regards,
>Sudeep