lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:36:31 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom-ipcc: simplify the example

On 20/04/2022 16:22, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 3:42 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/04/2022 17:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Consumer examples in the bindings of resource providers are trivial,
>>> useless and duplicating code.  Additionally the incomplete qcom,smp2p
>>> example triggers DT schema warnings.
>>>
>>> Cleanup the example by removing the consumer part and fixing the
>>> indentation to DT schema convention.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> Jassi,
>> Do you plan to pick this mailbox patch?
>>
> Yes, I do.  I am ok too, if you want it through some other tree as a
> part of some bigger patchset.

It's not going through any other tree, so please pick it up.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ