[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ce5f3b8-3c6b-1e83-94c2-84f4ad8aa9dc@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 14:46:14 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@...sung.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "open list:USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Howard Yen <howardyen@...gle.com>,
Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>,
Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>,
"J . Avila" <elavila@...gle.com>, sc.suh@...sung.com,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] add xhci-exynos driver
On 26/04/2022 11:18, Daehwan Jung wrote:
> This patchset is for Samsung Exynos xhci host conroller. It uses xhci-plat
> driver mainly and extends some functions by xhci hooks and overrides.
>
> This driver supports USB offload which makes Co-processor to use
> some memories of xhci. Especially it's useful for USB Audio scenario.
> Audio stream would get shortcut because Co-processor directly write/read
> data in xhci memories. It could get speed-up using faster memory like SRAM.
> That's why this gives vendors flexibilty of memory management. This feature
> is done with xhci hooks and overrides.
>
> Changes in v2 :
> - Fix commit message by adding Signed-off-by in each patch.
> - Fix conflict on latest.
>
> Changes in v3 :
> - Remove export symbols and xhci hooks which xhci-exynos don't need.
> - Modify commit message to clarify why it needs to export symbols.
> - Check compiling of xhci-exynos.
>
> Changes in v4 :
> - Modify commit message to clarify why it needs to export symbols.
> - Add a function for override of hc driver in xhci-plat.
> - Make xhci-exynos extending xhci-plat by xhci hooks and overrides.
> (vendor_init / vendor_cleanup hooks are useful from here v4)
> - Change the term (USB offload -> xhci-exynos) on subject of patches.
>
You received comments already that you need to base your work on recent
Linux kernel and use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to notify necessary
parties. This is the fourth patchset and still you did not do it.
Maybe there is some misunderstanding or trouble using
scripts/get_maintainers.pl, so could you clarify:
1. What is this based on? Output of: git describe
2. What does the scripts/get_maintainers.pl print when you run on this
patchset?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists