[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=9ffHMynzCPXPAAdz90BcW0JhihjqnRNneFqMq3u+59Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:39:54 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/27] modpost: make multiple export error
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:10 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 3:48 AM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 12:09 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is currently a warning, but I think modpost should stop building
> > > in this case.
> > >
> > > If the same symbol is exported multiple times and we let it keep going,
> > > the sanity check becomes difficult.
> > >
> > > Only the legitimate case is that an external module overrides the
> > > corresponding in-tree module to provide a different implementation
> > > with the same interface.
> >
> > Could the same module export a weak version of a symbol, and a strong one?
>
> No. There is no concept like EXPORT_SYMBOL_WEAK.
>
> I am talking about kmod things.
> You can modprobe an external module instead of the in-kernel one.
Ok, this patch seems fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists