lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+zpnLfS4nTjXYYgE_BNcjQPF1vWynOe_118YgTZa9S5G9dVdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 14:18:59 +1000
From:   ThiƩbaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Alistair Delva <adelva@...gle.com>,
        Adam Shih <adamshih@...gle.com>,
        SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware_loader: use kernel credentials when reading firmware

> Can you elaborate on the last sentence? It's unclear how what you
> describe is used exactly to allow driver to use direct filesystem
> firmware loading.

I realize my use of the word "device" here was unfortunate. I meant devices as
Android devices/systems. This may have contributed to the confusion.

Previously, Android systems were not setting up the firmware_class.path
command line argument. It means that the userspace fallback was always
kicking-in when a driver called request_firmware. This was handled by the
ueventd process on Android, which is generally given access to all firmware
files.

Now that more devices are setting up firmware_class.path, the call to
request_firmware will end up using kernel_read_file_from_path_initns, which
would have used the current process credentials.

>
> And, given the feedback from Android it would seem this is a fix
> which likely may be desirable to backport to some stable kernels?

Yes, that's right.

Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ