[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmgtLProFiMsyouf@xz-m1.local>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 13:34:36 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: Add missing cache flushing in
hugetlb_unshare_all_pmds()
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 03:45:02PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 02:33:19PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > Missed calling flush_cache_range() before removing the sharing PMD entrires,
> > otherwise data consistence issue may be occurred on some architectures whose
> > caches are strict and require a virtual–>physical translation to exist for
> > a virtual address. Thus add it.
> >
> > Fixes: 6dfeaff93be1 ("hugetlb/userfaultfd: unshare all pmds for hugetlbfs when register wp")
> > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE is only definded on riscv, arm64 and
> x86. All of them do not have a VIVT cache. In others words,
> flush_cache_range() is null on those architectures. So I suspect
> in practice this does not cause any issue. It is better to
> clarify this in commit log.
Looks correct.
>
> Anyway:
>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists