[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ymgxd6WGhUBuntkS@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:52:55 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: john.p.donnelly@...cle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
slade@...dewatkins.com, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/124] 5.15.36-rc1 review
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:37:21PM -0500, john.p.donnelly@...cle.com wrote:
> 76723ed1fb89 2021-12-01 | locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more
> consistent
>
> In Linux 5.15.y.
That commit is in 5.15.6, released December 1, 2021. And this just now
shows up? How is this related to 5.15.36-rc1?
Please start a new thread with the authors/reviewers of that commit and
we will be glad to discuss it.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists