lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220426181925.3940286-1-dlatypov@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:19:22 -0700
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: rename print_subtest_{start,end} for clarity (s/subtest/suite)

These names sound more general than they are.

The _end() function increments a `static int kunit_suite_counter`, so it
can only safely be called on suites, aka top-level subtests.
It would need to have a separate counter for each level of subtest to be
generic enough.

So rename it to make it clear it's only appropriate for suites.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
---
 lib/kunit/test.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 0f66c13d126e..64ee6a9d8003 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
 
-static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
 	kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s",
 		  suite->name);
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_has_succeeded);
 
 static size_t kunit_suite_counter = 1;
 
-static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+static void kunit_print_suite_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
 	kunit_print_ok_not_ok((void *)suite, false,
 			      kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite),
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 	struct kunit_result_stats suite_stats = { 0 };
 	struct kunit_result_stats total_stats = { 0 };
 
-	kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
+	kunit_print_suite_start(suite);
 
 	kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
 		struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 	}
 
 	kunit_print_suite_stats(suite, suite_stats, total_stats);
-	kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
+	kunit_print_suite_end(suite);
 
 	return 0;
 }

base-commit: 59729170afcd4900e08997a482467ffda8d88c7f
-- 
2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ