linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 3/4] RISC-V: Prefer sstc extension if available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220426185245.281182-4-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:52:44 -0700
From:   Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] RISC-V: Prefer sstc extension if available

RISC-V ISA has sstc extension which allows updating the next clock event
via a CSR (stimecmp) instead of an SBI call. This should happen dynamically
if sstc extension is available. Otherwise, it will fallback to SBI call
to maintain backward compatibility.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
---
 drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
index 1767f8bf2013..d9398ae84a20 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
@@ -23,11 +23,24 @@
 #include <asm/sbi.h>
 #include <asm/timex.h>
 
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(riscv_sstc_available);
+
 static int riscv_clock_next_event(unsigned long delta,
 		struct clock_event_device *ce)
 {
+	uint64_t next_tval = get_cycles64() + delta;
+
 	csr_set(CSR_IE, IE_TIE);
-	sbi_set_timer(get_cycles64() + delta);
+	if (static_branch_likely(&riscv_sstc_available)) {
+#if __riscv_xlen == 32
+		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, next_tval & 0xFFFFFFFF);
+		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMPH, next_tval >> 32);
+#else
+		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, next_tval);
+#endif
+	} else
+		sbi_set_timer(next_tval);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -165,6 +178,12 @@ static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
 	if (error)
 		pr_err("cpu hp setup state failed for RISCV timer [%d]\n",
 		       error);
+
+	if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSTC)) {
+		pr_info("Timer interrupt in S-mode is available via sstc extension\n");
+		static_branch_enable(&riscv_sstc_available);
+	}
+
 	return error;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1