lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220426123412.51fb58780a8fe2b32c7814ce@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:34:12 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/highmem: VM_BUG_ON() if offset + len > PAGE_SIZE

On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 21:30:20 +0200 "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com> wrote:

> Add VM_BUG_ON() bounds checking to make sure that, if "offset + len>
> PAGE_SIZE", memset() does not corrupt data in adjacent pages.
> 

hm, why?  To match all the other functions in there?

I suppose that's logical.  Or we could just delete all the other
VM_BUG_ON()s.  Have any of them proven to be at all useful?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ