| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1651003453-12282-1-git-send-email-quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 13:04:13 -0700
From: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
To: <robdclark@...il.com>, <sean@...rly.run>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
<dianders@...omium.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<airlied@...ux.ie>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC: <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, <quic_aravindh@...cinc.com>,
<quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4] drm/msm/dp: remove fail safe mode related code
Current DP driver implementation has adding safe mode done at
dp_hpd_plug_handle() which is expected to be executed under event
thread context.
However there is possible circular locking happen (see blow stack trace)
after edp driver call dp_hpd_plug_handle() from dp_bridge_enable() which
is executed under drm_thread context.
After review all possibilities methods and as discussed on
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/483155/, supporting EDID
compliance tests in the driver is quite hacky. As seen with other
vendor drivers, supporting these will be much easier with IGT. Hence
removing all the related fail safe code for it so that no possibility
of circular lock will happen.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.15.35-lockdep #6 Tainted: G W
------------------------------------------------------
frecon/429 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffff808dc3c4e8 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
dp_panel_add_fail_safe_mode+0x4c/0xa0
but task is already holding lock:
ffffff808dc441e0 (&kms->commit_lock[i]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_crtcs+0xb4/0x124
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&kms->commit_lock[i]){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0x174/0x1a64
mutex_lock_nested+0x98/0xac
lock_crtcs+0xb4/0x124
msm_atomic_commit_tail+0x330/0x748
commit_tail+0x19c/0x278
drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1dc/0x1f0
drm_atomic_commit+0xc0/0xd8
drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0xb4/0x134
drm_mode_setcrtc+0x688/0x1248
drm_ioctl_kernel+0x1e4/0x338
drm_ioctl+0x3a4/0x684
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x118/0x154
invoke_syscall+0x78/0x224
el0_svc_common+0x178/0x200
do_el0_svc+0x94/0x13c
el0_svc+0x5c/0xec
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x78/0x108
el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
-> #2 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0x174/0x1a64
ww_mutex_lock+0xb8/0x278
modeset_lock+0x304/0x4ac
drm_modeset_lock+0x4c/0x7c
drmm_mode_config_init+0x4a8/0xc50
msm_drm_init+0x274/0xac0
msm_drm_bind+0x20/0x2c
try_to_bring_up_master+0x3dc/0x470
__component_add+0x18c/0x3c0
component_add+0x1c/0x28
dp_display_probe+0x954/0xa98
platform_probe+0x124/0x15c
really_probe+0x1b0/0x5f8
__driver_probe_device+0x174/0x20c
driver_probe_device+0x70/0x134
__device_attach_driver+0x130/0x1d0
bus_for_each_drv+0xfc/0x14c
__device_attach+0x1bc/0x2bc
device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
bus_probe_device+0x94/0x178
deferred_probe_work_func+0x1a4/0x1f0
process_one_work+0x5d4/0x9dc
worker_thread+0x898/0xccc
kthread+0x2d4/0x3d4
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
-> #1 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}:
ww_acquire_init+0x1c4/0x2c8
drm_modeset_acquire_init+0x44/0xc8
drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0xb0/0x12dc
drm_mode_getconnector+0x5dc/0xfe8
drm_ioctl_kernel+0x1e4/0x338
drm_ioctl+0x3a4/0x684
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x118/0x154
invoke_syscall+0x78/0x224
el0_svc_common+0x178/0x200
do_el0_svc+0x94/0x13c
el0_svc+0x5c/0xec
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x78/0x108
el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
-> #0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x2650/0x672c
lock_acquire+0x1b4/0x4ac
__mutex_lock_common+0x174/0x1a64
mutex_lock_nested+0x98/0xac
dp_panel_add_fail_safe_mode+0x4c/0xa0
dp_hpd_plug_handle+0x1f0/0x280
dp_bridge_enable+0x94/0x2b8
drm_atomic_bridge_chain_enable+0x11c/0x168
drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables+0x500/0x740
msm_atomic_commit_tail+0x3e4/0x748
commit_tail+0x19c/0x278
drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1dc/0x1f0
drm_atomic_commit+0xc0/0xd8
drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0xb4/0x134
drm_mode_setcrtc+0x688/0x1248
drm_ioctl_kernel+0x1e4/0x338
drm_ioctl+0x3a4/0x684
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x118/0x154
invoke_syscall+0x78/0x224
el0_svc_common+0x178/0x200
do_el0_svc+0x94/0x13c
el0_svc+0x5c/0xec
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x78/0x108
el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
Changes in v2:
-- re text commit title
-- remove all fail safe mode
Changes in v3:
-- remove dp_panel_add_fail_safe_mode() from dp_panel.h
-- add Fixes
Changes in v4:
-- to=dianders@...omium.org
Fixes: 8b2c181 ("drm/msm/dp: add fail safe mode outside of event_mutex context")
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
Fixes: f1b47e6a8df8 ("drm/msm/dp: remove fail safe mode related code")
Reported-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
index f141872..26f4b695 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c
@@ -206,17 +206,6 @@ int dp_panel_read_sink_caps(struct dp_panel *dp_panel,
rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
goto end;
}
-
- /* fail safe edid */
- mutex_lock(&connector->dev->mode_config.mutex);
- if (drm_add_modes_noedid(connector, 640, 480))
- drm_set_preferred_mode(connector, 640, 480);
- mutex_unlock(&connector->dev->mode_config.mutex);
- } else {
- /* always add fail-safe mode as backup mode */
- mutex_lock(&connector->dev->mode_config.mutex);
- drm_add_modes_noedid(connector, 640, 480);
- mutex_unlock(&connector->dev->mode_config.mutex);
}
if (panel->aux_cfg_update_done) {
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists