[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220426130857.09f40743b42b5f0bf4f19a59@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 13:08:57 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
Cc: "maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org" <maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/70] Introducing the Maple Tree
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:06:19 +0000 Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
> The maple tree is an RCU-safe range based B-tree designed to use modern
> processor cache efficiently. There are a number of places in the kernel
I think it would be helpful to expand on "a number of places".
Specifically which places?
> that a non-overlapping range-based tree would be beneficial, especially
> one with a simple interface. The first user that is covered in this
> patch set is the vm_area_struct, where three data structures are
> replaced by the maple tree: the augmented rbtree, the vma cache, and the
> linked list of VMAs in the mm_struct. The long term goal is to reduce
> or remove the mmap_sem contention.
"mmap_lock" ;)
>
> The tree has a branching factor of 10 for non-leaf nodes and 16 for leaf
> nodes. With the increased branching factor, it is significantly shorter than
> the rbtree so it has fewer cache misses. The removal of the linked list
> between subsequent entries also reduces the cache misses and the need to pull
> in the previous and next VMA during many tree alterations.
Do we have any quantitative testing results?
What's the plan on utilizing this to further reduce mmap_lock contention?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists