lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1yJkegvgvzHemBd_dowvpyDmxtUnrpiHob8+hiNeO4sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 23:15:48 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
Cc:     Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Apple M1 (Pro/Max) NVMe driver

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:15 PM Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This series includes everything[*] required to get NVMe up and running on
> Apple's M1, M1 Pro and M1 Max SoCs.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20220321165049.35985-1-sven@svenpeter.dev/T/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20220415142055.30873-1-sven@svenpeter.dev/T/
>
> Thanks everyone for the reviews of v2 again! There are just some minor
> changes since v2 listed in the individual commits again.

Nice! I had not looked at v2 in much detail, but I'm perfectly happy
with this version,

I found a few things that could be improved if you do a respin, but
nothing important.

> [*] The only missing part in this series are the device tree updates
>     but since these will go through arm-soc anyway I haven't included
>     them here but will instead submit them once this series is in a shape
>     where it can be merged.

Just as a clarification: the drivers/soc/ portion should normally go through the
soc tree as well, but I'm happy for those to get merged along with the
nvme driver
if that helps get it all mainlined more quickly.

       Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ