linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC fs/namespace] Make kern_unmount() use synchronize_rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAQBG5jnvSxcjwr+L5nuxwh87bv=D=tzU325W2Zp3DVpn-VmcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:58:34 +0200
From:   Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@...gle.com>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org
Cc:     Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "riel@...riel.com" <riel@...riel.com>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC fs/namespace] Make kern_unmount() use synchronize_rcu_expedited()

> 3. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220218183114.2867528-1-riel@surriel.com/
>         Refined queue_rcu_work() approach.
>
> #1 should work, but the resulting IPIs are not going to make the real-time
> guys happy.  #2 and #3 have been subject to reasonably heavy testing
> and did fix a very similar issue to the one that you are reporting,
> but last I knew there were doubts about the concurrency consequences.
>
> Could you please give at least #3 a shot and see if it helps you?
>

I have tried #3 and it works well with my testcases as far as I can see it.

Christoph