[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3662c725-a919-443a-9ab8-dc536cb5c03b@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 06:20:19 +0000
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
CC: "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"shinichiro.kawasaki@....com" <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"yi.zhang@...wei.com" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
"chaitanya.kulkarni@....com" <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] null-blk: save memory footprint for struct nullb_cmd
On 4/25/22 19:21, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Total 16 bytes can be saved in two ways:
>
> 1) The field 'bio' will only be used in bio based mode, and the field
> 'rq' will only be used in mq mode. Since they won't be used in the
> same time, declare a union for them.
> 2) The field 'bool fake_timeout' can be placed in the hole after the
> field 'error'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
-ck
Powered by blists - more mailing lists