lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:45:05 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: stm32: Add compatible strings
 for Protonic T1L boards

On 26/04/2022 08:35, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 04:06:45PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 25/04/2022 15:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 25/04/2022 15:28, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>>> This boards are based on STM32MP151AAD3 and use 10BaseT1L for
>>>> communication.
>>>>
>>>> - PRTT1C - 10BaseT1L switch
>>>> - PRTT1S - 10BaseT1L CO2 sensor board
>>>> - PRTT1A - 10BaseT1L multi functional controller
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> Although the order is still messed up. I through you will move the entry
>> just slightly up, not to the beginning, so maybe just rebase on top of:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220425140436.332467-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
> 
> I put it according to the SoC version. st,stm32mp151 would be the first
> entry before stm32mp153. What order do you prefer, where should I put my
> boards?

153 is defined lower. The first entry in the file is a trap. :)


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ