[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220426070628.167565-1-wanjiabing@vivo.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:06:28 +0800
From: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kael_w@...h.net, joe@...ches.com, Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] ring-buffer: simplify if-if to if-else
Use if and else instead of if(A) and if (!A).
Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com>
---
Change log:
v2:
- add braces to the if block and make pr_info nicer.
v3:
- keep the original line breakage.
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 05dfc7a12d3d..655d6db3e3c3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -6011,10 +6011,10 @@ static __init int test_ringbuffer(void)
pr_info(" total events: %ld\n", total_lost + total_read);
pr_info(" recorded len bytes: %ld\n", total_len);
pr_info(" recorded size bytes: %ld\n", total_size);
- if (total_lost)
+ if (total_lost) {
pr_info(" With dropped events, record len and size may not match\n"
" alloced and written from above\n");
- if (!total_lost) {
+ } else {
if (RB_WARN_ON(buffer, total_len != total_alloc ||
total_size != total_written))
break;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists