[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220426071231.zfdrok3ulgewomib@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:42:31 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ionela.Voinescu@....com,
Lukasz.Luba@....com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, maz@...nel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Enable EAS for CPPC/ACPI based systems
On 26-04-22, 09:10, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> Hello Viresh,
> The 2 patches are relying on Lukasz' patch-set at:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/3/21/282
> The serie was accepted by Rafael (cf. https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/4/13/701) and
> is currently in linux-next. More specifically, the missing patch causing the
> build failure is: 'PM: EM: Add .get_cost() callback'
>
> From what I see, the branch cpufreq/arm/linux-next (from your repo) that was
> used in the CI is based on v5.18-rc1 and doesn't have Lukasz' patches. Should
> we wait for the patches to be in a rc version, or is there a process for this
> kind of case ?
Ok.
Rafael: Please pick these patches directly.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists