linux-kernel - Re: [broonie-sound:for-5.19 88/98] sound/soc/soc-acpi.c:58:36: warning: initialization of 'struct acpi_device *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <62af4093-a4ff-62b1-10db-585235c06747@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:25:30 +0200
From:   Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [broonie-sound:for-5.19 88/98] sound/soc/soc-acpi.c:58:36:
 warning: initialization of 'struct acpi_device *' from 'int' makes pointer
 from integer without a cast

On 4/26/2022 4:54 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.3.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arc SHELL=/bin/bash sound/soc/

/home/xxxxxxxx/0day/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/arceb-elf/bin/arceb-elf-gcc: 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found 
(required by 
/home/xxxxxxxx/0day/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/arceb-elf/bin/arceb-elf-gcc)
/home/xxxxxxxx/0day/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/arceb-elf/bin/arceb-elf-gcc: 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found 
(required by 
/home/xxxxxxxx/0day/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/arceb-elf/bin/arceb-elf-gcc)
   SYNC    include/config/auto.conf.cmd
   GEN     Makefile
/home/xxxxxxxx/0day/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/arceb-elf/bin/arceb-elf-gcc: 
unknown compiler
scripts/Kconfig.include:44: Sorry, this compiler is not supported.

Having a "nolibc" in compiler path I find it confusing that it seems to 
require glibc...?

I guess I will be able to figure what's going on without reproduction, 
but would be probably easier with reproducer ;) .