[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4686508.cEBGB3zze1@pc-42>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 10:19:29 +0200
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: net: silabs, wfx: add prt, prtt1c-wfm200 antenna variant
On Tuesday 26 April 2022 09:21:13 CEST Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 05:38:20PM +0200, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> > On Monday 25 April 2022 15:28:42 CEST Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > Add compatible for wfm200 antenna configuration variant for Protonic PRTT1C
> > > board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/staging/net/wireless/silabs,wfx.yaml | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/net/wireless/silabs,wfx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/net/wireless/silabs,wfx.yaml
> > > index 105725a127ab..ce107fe45d7c 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/net/wireless/silabs,wfx.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/net/wireless/silabs,wfx.yaml
> > > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ properties:
> > > compatible:
> > > items:
> > > - enum:
> > > + - prt,prtt1c-wfm200 # Protonic PRTT1C Board
> > > - silabs,brd4001a # WGM160P Evaluation Board
> > > - silabs,brd8022a # WF200 Evaluation Board
> > > - silabs,brd8023a # WFM200 Evaluation Board
> >
> > I think you also have to declare this new entry in wfx_sdio_of_match,
> > and/or wfx_spi_of_match and wfx_spi_id.
> >
> > On the WFM200 variant, the antenna is built in the chip. So I think you
> > can point on the same configuration than the brd8023a.
>
> I assume driver update can be made in a separate patch. As soon as we
> reserved compatible for this boards there should be no conflicts. This patches
> series is targeting only devicetree and needed DT schema changes.
hmmm... I am not DT specialist, but it seems a bit weird to have a new
entry in the dt schema, but no new code in any of_match table.
--
Jérôme Pouiller
Powered by blists - more mailing lists