linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 17/24] openvswitch: fix OOB access in reserve_sfa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220426081731.882026527@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 10:21:11 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Valerio <pvalerio@...hat.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 17/24] openvswitch: fix OOB access in reserve_sfa_size()

From: Paolo Valerio <pvalerio@...hat.com>

commit cefa91b2332d7009bc0be5d951d6cbbf349f90f8 upstream.

Given a sufficiently large number of actions, while copying and
reserving memory for a new action of a new flow, if next_offset is
greater than MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE, the function reserve_sfa_size() does
not return -EMSGSIZE as expected, but it allocates MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE
bytes increasing actions_len by req_size. This can then lead to an OOB
write access, especially when further actions need to be copied.

Fix it by rearranging the flow action size check.

KASAN splat below:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch]
Write of size 65360 at addr ffff888147e4001c by task handler15/836

CPU: 1 PID: 836 Comm: handler15 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1+ #27
...
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x5a
 print_report.cold+0x5e/0x5db
 ? __lock_text_start+0x8/0x8
 ? reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch]
 kasan_report+0xb5/0x130
 ? reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch]
 kasan_check_range+0xf5/0x1d0
 memcpy+0x39/0x60
 reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch]
 __add_action+0x24/0x120 [openvswitch]
 ovs_nla_add_action+0xe/0x20 [openvswitch]
 ovs_ct_copy_action+0x29d/0x1130 [openvswitch]
 ? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30
 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x56/0xa0
 ? create_prof_cpu_mask+0x20/0x20
 ? ovs_ct_verify+0xf0/0xf0 [openvswitch]
 ? prep_compound_page+0x198/0x2a0
 ? __kasan_check_byte+0x10/0x40
 ? kasan_unpoison+0x40/0x70
 ? ksize+0x44/0x60
 ? reserve_sfa_size+0x75/0x380 [openvswitch]
 __ovs_nla_copy_actions+0xc26/0x2070 [openvswitch]
 ? __zone_watermark_ok+0x420/0x420
 ? validate_set.constprop.0+0xc90/0xc90 [openvswitch]
 ? __alloc_pages+0x1a9/0x3e0
 ? __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x1da0/0x1da0
 ? unwind_next_frame+0x991/0x1e40
 ? __mod_node_page_state+0x99/0x120
 ? __mod_lruvec_page_state+0x2e3/0x470
 ? __kasan_kmalloc_large+0x90/0xe0
 ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x1b4/0x2c0 [openvswitch]
 ovs_flow_cmd_new+0x3cd/0xb10 [openvswitch]
 ...

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: f28cd2af22a0 ("openvswitch: fix flow actions reallocation")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valerio <pvalerio@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
@@ -1863,7 +1863,7 @@ static struct nlattr *reserve_sfa_size(s
 	new_acts_size = max(next_offset + req_size, ksize(*sfa) * 2);
 
 	if (new_acts_size > MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE) {
-		if ((MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE - next_offset) < req_size) {
+		if ((next_offset + req_size) > MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE) {
 			OVS_NLERR(log, "Flow action size exceeds max %u",
 				  MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE);
 			return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);