[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5485f529-e99a-0bdd-07bd-b5b559da91e6@interlog.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:54:31 -0400
From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, james.smart@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] scsi: core: constify pointer to scsi_host_template
On 2022-04-25 21:16, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/25/22 06:04, John Garry wrote:
>> On 25/04/2022 10:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> For example scsi_proc_hostdir_rm(): 'present' and 'proc_dir' members.
>>> Where should they be stored? Should they be moved to the Scsi_Host?
>>>
>>
>> I don't think scsi_Host is appropriate as this is per-scsi host template,
>> unless you see a way to do it that way. Alternatively we could keep a separate
>> list of registered sht, like this:
>>
>> struct sht_proc_dir {
>> int cnt;
>> struct list_head list;
>> struct proc_dir_entry *proc_dir;
>> struct scsi_host_template *sht;
>> };
>> static LIST_HEAD(sht_proc_dir_list);
>>
>> void scsi_proc_hostdir_add(struct scsi_host_template *sht)
>> {
>> struct sht_proc_dir *dir;
>>
>> if (!sht->show_info)
>> return;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&global_host_template_mutex);
>> list_for_each_entry(dir, &sht_proc_dir_list, list) {
>> if (dir->sht == sht) {
>> dir->cnt++;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> }
>> dir = kzalloc(sizeof(*dir), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!dir)
>> goto out;
>>
>> dir->proc_dir = proc_mkdir(sht->proc_name, proc_scsi);
>> if (!dir->proc_dir) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: proc_mkdir failed for %s\n",
>> __func__, sht->proc_name);
>> kfree(dir);
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> dir->cnt++;
>> list_add_tail(&dir->list, &sht_proc_dir_list);
>> out:
>> mutex_unlock(&global_host_template_mutex);
>> }
>
> How about removing scsi_proc_hostdir_add(), scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() and all other
> code that creates files or directories under /proc/scsi? There should be
> corresponding entries in sysfs for all /proc/scsi entries. Some tools in
> sg3_utils use that directory so sg3_utils will have to be updated.
... breaking this:
~$ cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM-207x Model: HUSMM8020ASS20 Rev: J4B6
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 06
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM-207x Model: HUSMM8020ASS20 Rev: J4B6
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 06
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00
Vendor: SEAGATE Model: ST200FM0073 Rev: 0007
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 06
...
A deprecation notice would be helpful, then removal after a few kernel
cycles. Yes, lsscsi can give that output:
$ lsscsi -c
Attached devices:
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Target: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: SEAGATE Model: ST200FM0073 Rev: 0007
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 06
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Target: 01 Lun: 00
Vendor: WDC Model: WSH722020AL5204 Rev: C421
Type: Zoned Block ANSI SCSI revision: 07
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Target: 02 Lun: 00
Vendor: Areca Te Model: ARC-802801.37.69 Rev: 0137
Type: Enclosure ANSI SCSI revision: 05
...
[Hmmm, in a different order.]
However no distribution that I'm aware of includes lsscsi in its installation.
[Most recent example: Ubuntu 22.04]
Linux is not alone ... in FreeBSD how do you list SCSI devices in your
system? Answer: as root you invoke 'camcontrol devlist', it's so obvious.
Perhaps the Linux kernel could have a deprecation process which uses inotify
or similar to notice accesses to /proc/scsi/scsi (say) and print out
a helpful response along the lines" "this is no longer supported, try using
the lsscsi utility".
Doug Gilbert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists