lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 18:31:32 +0300
From:   Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] interconnect: qcom: constify qcom_icc_desc


On 27.04.22 15:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/04/2022 14:17, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> On 22.04.22 18:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 12/04/2022 12:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> struct qcom_icc_desc is not modified so it can be made const for safety.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8916.c |  6 +++---
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8939.c |  8 ++++----
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8974.c | 12 ++++++------
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/qcm2290.c | 12 ++++++------
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/qcs404.c  |  6 +++---
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/sc7180.c  | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/sc7280.c  | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/sdm660.c  | 12 ++++++------
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8150.c  | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8250.c  | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8350.c  | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8450.c  | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Any comments here?
>>
>> Thanks for the patches! I had actually some of these changes in my local tree
>> for a long time.
> 
> Indeed I see them now in linux-next. Sorry for pinging, I just did not
> get any notification they got applied.

I meant that i did similar changes, that i never sent upstream, so thanks
for doing this. Pings are welcome.

BR,
Georgi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ