[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0f6ea2c3-586d-4f5a-9cee-688cd73b96b3@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:33:50 +0200
From: "Sven Peter" <sven@...npeter.dev>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Hector Martin" <marcan@...can.st>,
"Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@...nel.org>, "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@...nel.org>, "Janne Grunau" <j@...nau.net>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Apple M1 (Pro/Max) NVMe driver
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022, at 23:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:15 PM Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series includes everything[*] required to get NVMe up and running on
>> Apple's M1, M1 Pro and M1 Max SoCs.
>>
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20220321165049.35985-1-sven@svenpeter.dev/T/
>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20220415142055.30873-1-sven@svenpeter.dev/T/
>>
>> Thanks everyone for the reviews of v2 again! There are just some minor
>> changes since v2 listed in the individual commits again.
>
> Nice! I had not looked at v2 in much detail, but I'm perfectly happy
> with this version,
>
> I found a few things that could be improved if you do a respin, but
> nothing important.
Thanks, I'll respin it later this week to fix those things!
>
>> [*] The only missing part in this series are the device tree updates
>> but since these will go through arm-soc anyway I haven't included
>> them here but will instead submit them once this series is in a shape
>> where it can be merged.
>
> Just as a clarification: the drivers/soc/ portion should normally go through the
> soc tree as well, but I'm happy for those to get merged along with the
> nvme driver
> if that helps get it all mainlined more quickly.
Makes sense!
I don't think I'll be ready to submit USB3/USB4/Thunderbolt (which also needs
RTKit) during this cycle but I think there's a decent chance marcan will submit
SMC which also depends on RTKit and will go through a different subsystem.
What's the best way to handle the RTKit commits in that case?
It would be great if we could get both into 5.19.
Sven
Powered by blists - more mailing lists