lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0f6ea2c3-586d-4f5a-9cee-688cd73b96b3@www.fastmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:33:50 +0200
From:   "Sven Peter" <sven@...npeter.dev>
To:     "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     "Hector Martin" <marcan@...can.st>,
        "Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Keith Busch" <kbusch@...nel.org>, "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
        "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "Marc Zyngier" <maz@...nel.org>, "Janne Grunau" <j@...nau.net>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Apple M1 (Pro/Max) NVMe driver

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022, at 23:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:15 PM Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series includes everything[*] required to get NVMe up and running on
>> Apple's M1, M1 Pro and M1 Max SoCs.
>>
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20220321165049.35985-1-sven@svenpeter.dev/T/
>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20220415142055.30873-1-sven@svenpeter.dev/T/
>>
>> Thanks everyone for the reviews of v2 again! There are just some minor
>> changes since v2 listed in the individual commits again.
>
> Nice! I had not looked at v2 in much detail, but I'm perfectly happy
> with this version,
>
> I found a few things that could be improved if you do a respin, but
> nothing important.

Thanks, I'll respin it later this week to fix those things!

>
>> [*] The only missing part in this series are the device tree updates
>>     but since these will go through arm-soc anyway I haven't included
>>     them here but will instead submit them once this series is in a shape
>>     where it can be merged.
>
> Just as a clarification: the drivers/soc/ portion should normally go through the
> soc tree as well, but I'm happy for those to get merged along with the
> nvme driver
> if that helps get it all mainlined more quickly.

Makes sense!
I don't think I'll be ready to submit USB3/USB4/Thunderbolt (which also needs
RTKit) during this cycle but I think there's a decent chance marcan will submit
SMC which also depends on RTKit and will go through a different subsystem.
What's the best way to handle the RTKit commits in that case?
It would be great if we could get both into 5.19.


Sven

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ