[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB20375995F62C613F8D18825D80FA9@OSBPR01MB2037.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:51:27 +0000
From: "tarumizu.kohei@...itsu.com" <tarumizu.kohei@...itsu.com>
To: 'Reinette Chatre' <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 6/9] x86: resctrl: pseudo_lock: Fix to restore to
original value when re-enabling hardware prefetch register
Thanks for the comment.
> Thank you very much for catching this issue. This fix is not specific to or required
> by the driver you are creating in this series so you could also extract this patch and
> submit it separately as a fix to resctrl.
I would like to send this patch separated from this series next time.
> When you do resubmit there are a few style related points that I highlight here, the
> fix itself looks good.
>
> For the subject, please use "x86/resctrl:" prefix in the subject.
> This needs a Fixes tag. A few patches are impacted by this fix:
>
> Fixes: 018961ae5579 ("x86/intel_rdt: Pseudo-lock region creation/removal
> core")
> Fixes: 443810fe6160 ("x86/intel_rdt: Create debugfs files for pseudo-locking
> testing")
> Fixes: 8a2fc0e1bc0c ("x86/intel_rdt: More precise L2 hit/miss measurements")
I would like to use this prefix and add Fixes tag for the next patch.
> Please do follow the current style of using "reverse fir tree order".
> More information in:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docume
> ntation/process/maintainer-tip.rst#n587
> Same as above.
I check the URL to fix style problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists